The Impromptu Toolkit: Morse Code

If you have any magic friends that you spend time with at all, I think you should make an effort to learn Morse code. Now, this is probably a clunky way to code information between people. I'm sure there are super clever magician ways that I don't know about, but the reason I recommend Morse code is first because it's fairly universal. It's not a clever magic code, it's a dull regular person code, but it's something you can learn pretty easily without having to have access to secret magic stuff. And it's a very all-purpose code because you can easily transfer the information visually, audibly, or via touch.

Why to Learn Morse Code

Well, in case you get trapped under earthquake rubble and you need to bang on a pipe so people know you're still alive, for one. 

Or you can use it in magic tricks.

I don't think it works well for a legitimate coding act where you're supposed to be transmitting information to someone. But it does work very well when you or your friend are acting as a secret confederate. 

Your friend says. "I'm going to leave the room. I want you all to settle on a thought to send me when I come back."

"What a load of horseshit," you say, dismissively.

A minute later he comes back and joins you at the table. Everyone concentrates. It's dead silent. No one moves. After a few seconds he says "Lobster." Everyone flips out.

Of course it's just you tapping it out in morse code on his foot from across the table.


The most powerful response I've received from a trick that used Morse code as part of the method was as part of a seance effect. One friend had written down the name of someone she wanted to contact on business card. I peeked the information. I coded it to my friend who was also at the table via tapping his foot. Then everyone except me put their hands on the Ouija planchette and it spelled out the person's name; a name that had never been revealed and without the "magician" even touching anything.


The nice thing about Morse code is you only need two elements: a dot and a dash. So anything that gives you two "signals" can work. You could hang black and white socks on a clothesline to spell out sexy things to your hot neighbor. You could have face-up and face-down cards code a word to someone.

One time my friend made the absurd and mathematically impossible claim that at any time, every song every recorded is being played on the radio somewhere in the world and he could find it on the radio dial. "It may be very very faint, but it's possible to pick it up if you have good ears."

"Well, I've got great ears," I said.

My friend asked another person to whisper a song in his ear which he claimed he would find on the radio. He tuned the radio along the AM dial. Songs faded in and out. He eventually got to one point on the dial and said, "I'm close. It's going to be hard to pinpoint the exact frequency."

After a minute or so I—at a point where it still just sounded like fuzz—I scrunched my eyes and said, "I think I hear something." I put the radio close to my ear and listened intently.

Then I started singing.

Hold me closer tiny dancer
bum bum BUM!
Count the headlights on the highwayyyyyyyyy

The method? There was a point on the dial that was neutral. Once he settled on that number the coding started. To the left of the number would be a dot and to the right of the number would be a dash. He would pause for a longer time on the number to indicate a break between letters. So what looked like him trying to get an exact tuning was actually him coding the song to me.

Once he got out T-I-N-Y-D, I knew where it was going and stepped in to say I was hearing something.


I've tried to come up with more interesting ways to transmit the information than directly tapping it to someone else, but I haven't really come up with anything great to use in most situations.

One that was fun to play around with was this. I would have eight pennies, nickels, dimes, and quarters in rows on the table and a large glass. My morse code friend was either out of the room or hadn't arrived yet. I'd ask another friend to think of a simple one syllable word. Once they had named a word I would start tapping the coins on the glass one by one, evaluating the sound they made. Some I would toss into the glass and some I wouldn't. At the end I'd have a glass with a number of coins in it. When my confederate arrived I'd ask my friend to take the glass and swirl the coins around next to my confederate's ear. 

"Do you hear any word in the sound of the coins whirling around?" I'd ask my partner.

"Kind of... it sounds like... sock maybe?"

So you have your coins on the table like this.

You look at things in sequences of two coins. If two coins are together, that's consider a dash. If only one coin is in a two-coin area, that's considered a dot. No coins in a two coin area means the letter is made up of less than four elements so you removed the rest of the coins in that row.

This sounds more complicated than it is. Each row is a letter. Letters are made up of at most four elements (dots and dashes). A dash is two coins. A dot is one coin. I just remove all the coins to make what's left on the table indicate the letter.

So if the spectator is thinking of SOCK, the coins you would leave on the table are like so:

S   ...
O  ---
C  -.-.
K  -.-

You might think people will realize you're coding the word somehow through the layout of the coins on the table. And yeah, you're probably right. I didn't say it was a good idea. I said I had fun playing around with it. I don't think it's as transparent as it might seem. Having the coins in a grid at the beginning is a feasible way you might have things set up if you wanted to search through the coins for ones with the right "tone" to transmit this words when swirled around. That would keep things organized. And the process of tapping the coins against the glass and really listening seems somewhat meaningful. Your attention is on the coins you put in the glass, not what's left on the table. And your confederate can read those coins on the table very quickly from far away once they're used to the system. So you can scoop them up and put them away soon after he enters the room. But again, I wouldn't argue that it's a great trick.

It doesn't matter if your spectator chooses a word longer than four letters. You just do the first four and your confederate will either figure out what the rest is or just end up saying something close, so you're all set.


How to Learn Morse Code

Here is a chart with the Morse code symbols the letter consists of built into the shape of the letter. "Dit" is a dot, and "Dah" is a dash (don't ask me why).

Take 15 minutes and learn a row each day and you'll have it down in four days.

After you have it down, you can search online for Morse code practice sites.

The truth is, you just need to know the letters you don't have to be really good. You're not going to be coding whole sentences, just a word or two.

Modern Morse

Two last things.

The Apple watch has a feature where you can tap on the face of the watch and your friend/loved one will feel those taps on their wrist. (I mean, assuming they too have an Apple watch.) You can't do "dashes" so to do Morse code you have to do fast double-taps for the equivalent of dashes. It doesn't take long to figure out the timing. Or, if you're a masochist, you can learn the tap code too. The tap code is used by prisoners to communicate by tapping on walls or cells and just uses one knocking sound, not short and long sounds.

I haven't used the Apple watch to tap Morse code, but I have used it to transmit numbers and playing cards.

And finally, if you have an iPhone you can do what I did and go into your contacts list and assign a custom vibration for each of your contacts that is their name (or a word that describes them) in Morse code. It's very easy, you just go to edit their info and there's a choice that allows you to choose the vibration for when they call and you just choose "Create New Vibration." Then when someone calls you, even if your phone is on silent and in your pocket, you'll know who it is without looking. It's not a magic trick, but it kind of feels like one inside my head when I know who's on the phone without seeing or hearing anything. And it makes me feel smug and superior when I judge people who have to take their phones out and actually look to see who's calling. You poor suckers.


You might not really spend much time with other magicians, so you might think it's not worth the effort to learn this. Well, how about this idea. All of us who learn Morse code for magic purposes will get identical face tattoos. Then, when you're out in public, if you spot someone with the same tattoo, you'll know they're ready to be your secret helper for a magic trick.

Also, this will be a good way for us to let others know how "misunderstood" we are.

Senses Working Overtime

I'll get the secret out of the way here. This routine uses a stacked and marked deck. With that information you will be able to follow along with what's going on as I describe the effect. If you don't know a stack, then The Code deck, by Andy Nyman, would be ideal for this effect as well.

The trick is a little to me-centric for my tastes these days, but it's a very fun trick to perform and it might be of some interest to you.

You're talking with your friend and you mention some things you're working on in regards to magic and mindreading. At some point you bring up the concept of "using my five senses to mimic a sixth sense." You offer to demonstrate some of the exercises you've been doing to work on increasing your sensitivity to sensory input. 

There is a deck of cards on the table. 

You go into another room or stand in the corner Blair Witch-style. You ask your friend to take the deck, cut a portion of cards off of it, and toss those cards under one of the couch cushions. You then have her cut off another portion of cards and set it on the table. "Take the card on top of what's left in your hand—the card you just cut to—and put it in your shirt-pocket or in your bra or somewhere close to you where I can't see it." You then instruct her to place the cards that are left into the card box. 

You turn around or come back in the room. 

You take a seat on the couch, look up for a moment as if thinking about something, then write a few words on a piece of paper, fold it up, and place the note on the couch.

"Okay," you say, "the first sense you learn to exercise is vision. There are a number of physical exercises for the eyes. And there are also techniques that you practice to take in large quantities of information in a brief amount of time. Like in Rain Man when Dustin Hoffman counts the toothpicks."

Your 26-year-old friend has no idea what you're talking about and makes you feel old.

"Anyways," you say, "where is the second packet you cut off?" She points to the packet on the table. You ask her to pick it up and hold it between her thumb and first finger. You walk around the packet from a distance giving it a brief look all around.

"I think there are 17 cards there," you say.

She counts the cards and there are 17.

You talk for a moment about exercising your hearing. You ask the spectator to shake the card case with its cards inside. You listen intently. "I think there are 11...no... 10 cards in there." She counts the cards and you are correct. 

"Knowing how many cards are in both of those packets, it would be pretty easy for me to now tell you how many are under that cushion that I was sitting on a moment ago. I would just subtract the number of cards in those piles plus the one in your pocket from 52. Yes, it would be easy for me to tell you that now when we've counted these packets. But when I first came back here, and I had no information to go on—I didn't know if you had put 2 cards under the cushion or 40—I made a note on that piece of paper. Go check it."

She opens the note and it says, I'm sitting on 24 cards. She counts the cards under the cushion just to double check, and you were correct from the start. 

You have her reassemble the deck. With your back turned she removes the card from her pocket, reminds herself of its identity, and shuffles it into the deck. 

You spread the deck face-down on the table. You subtly sniff your way around the cards. Just short, rapid inhales through your nose, don't be gross about it. You start pushing cards away until you've narrowed it down to one card. You ask what card she had in her pocket. She says the three of hearts, you turn the card over and it's the three of hearts.


As I said, it should be obvious, but briefly here's what's happening:

1. When you come back into the room you note the top card of the stack on the table. One less than that cards stack number is how many cards are under the cushion. You write that on the piece of paper.

2. When you are circling the packet the spectator holds to test your vision, you note the bottom card of that packet. That's the key that unlocks everything else. You now know how many cards are in the "visual" packet (that card's stack number minus the number of cards under the couch cushion). You know the card that's in her pocket (the next one in the stack after the one you just glimpsed). And you know how many cards are in the "audio" packet. (Subtract the stack position of the card you just glimpsed from 51. (51 because one card is in her pocket.))

The rest is just acting and having fun.


I performed this effect probably 6 or so times before I retired it. And I think every time I did, the spectator asked about taste. Now, you could routine in another effect where you figure something out via taste, but that just makes it slightly too long, in my opinion. Instead I suggest you have some sort of joke or bit planned since it's probably going to come up.

I hesitate to say what I did because it's not a good idea for most performers, but it worked for me and the people I performed for. They would say, "What about taste? Do you use that sense in magic?"

"Yes, indeed I do. Here... I want you to think of any emotion at all. And don't just think of the emotion, but also think of a time you felt it strongly. Do you have an emotion in mind? Concentrate... concentrate... I want to see if I can pick up on the emotion you're feeling. You're concentrating, yes?"

They'd agree and I would grab their head in my hands and quickly and sloppily lick up the side of their face like a dog.

As they said, "Ugh!" and wiped my saliva off with their sleeve, I would click my tongue against the roof of my mouth as if I was evaluating the taste of a wine or something.

"Yes... yes... it's coming through. The emotion is very strong. You're...hmmm... yes, you're totally disgusted!"

They would have to admit my powers proved correct.

I only did this with old friends (both male and female) or newer friends who had indicated they didn't have an issue with me licking other parts of their body (if you catch my drift), so I knew it wasn't a complete invasion of their personal space. Is it gross? Yes, that's the idea. But it's more funny than gross with a close friend, so long as you have good oral hygiene. "Well, Andy, I don't think it's funny at all. If you licked my face we would have a serious problem." Well, guess what, you fucking lame-o, YOU'RE NOT THE TYPE OF PERSON I WOULD HANG OUT WITH. So it's not an issue.

Gardyloo #13

Thanks to Jonah Babins over at the Discourse in Magic blog for his very kind write-up about his picks for the top 5 posts on this blog. 


Although it was far too brief, we were fortunate to have Krystyn Lambert grace magic with her style, energy, and talent for the time that she did. She will be missed.

I hope I'm not jumping to conclusions. But based on her latest Instagram post, I'm expecting us to find (what remains of) her body washed ashore on the beach, in a dumpster, or plugging up some valve at a wastewater treatment plant sometime soon.


Book buyers: I expect The Jerx, Volume One to be shipped to you in approximately two weeks.


Oh, my babies, Daddy needs to get himself a copy of this book: Tricks to Pick Up Chicks. As I've stated before, this is my favorite sub-genre of magic. Take the social awkwardness of your typical magician and combine it with the desperation of your garden-variety pick-up artist and you create an ultra-loser science couldn't hope to build in the lab. The Six Million Dollar Creep.

I'm not against using magic in a manner that may intensify someone's initial interest or attraction. Hell, I'm not even against magic that has overtly sexual elements to it. (Those of you who accumulate the Jerx Points to receive the 20 for 20 book will find an effect in there that involves you sliding a finger into one of your spectator's orifices (your choice). It's about as intimate an effect as there is. But I wouldn't perform it for someone who doesn't already let you put a finger there.) But the way to perform magic to "pick up chicks" is just to do good magic like a normal human. It's the same way you utilize any talent to attract someone—do it effortlessly and really well and not in a creepy off-putting way.

But... maybe I'm wrong? The first effect in this book, as seen in the preview, has me questioning my thought process.

Now, I'm not quite sure how this translates into you picking up the chick. I guess what happens is she sucks on the straw so hard she develops a cerebral aneurysm, and, when it ruptures, her brain is damaged to the point where she finds a loser like you charming?

I guess I'll give it a shot. What do I have to lose? I'm sure she'll be into it. If there's one thing I know about women it's that they love it when a stranger messes around with their drink.


This is going to be a full week of posts. After today, all the posts are somewhat inter-related. We start tomorrow with an older effect of mine called Senses Working Overtime. I don't really do it anymore, but some of you might like it. And it leads into some other things I want to write about later in the week. 

Two Degrees of Separation

Dan Harlan sports his GLOMM elite shirt in the newest download of the Tarbell series over on Penguin. Once Dan is done with the Tarbell project he's going to do "Every Trick on the Blog" from this site as his next long-term download series. (That's a lie.)

I am now two degrees of separation from Harlan Tarbell. The GLOMM has really made inroads in just the two months that it has existed.

Hard to believe the Global League of Magicians and Mentalists is the ONLY magic organization that—as a rule—kicks out sex criminals. Apparently the IBM and SAM think it's just fine to diddle the younger generation. Look at the Code of Ethics for the IBM and SAM. Anything on there about not raping, torturing, and murdering nursing students? Nope. Well, welcome to the IBM, Richard Speck. You're in the clear. Just don't put your dove in too tight a harness.

This is also a good time to announce that while the grey Elite Member shirt will be the standard ones available going forward, the 2016 Secret Hyper-Elite Platinum Membership shirt (the red one) will not be reprinted. It will be a limited edition. As of this moment, all sizes are currently in stock, but only a few of each size, so if you want one don't dilly-dally. Get your membership kit soon.

Pastiches

This is a follow-up to the In Search Of Lost Time presentation from last Friday. 

It perhaps goes without mentioning, but you can use this same structure for a variety of tricks. It may be potentially more surreal and bizarre with other tricks, and that may be good or bad depending on what you're going for, but it's worth thinking about. 

I'll describe a quick variation on Version 1 and you can extrapolate from there. 

You have your two friends, Bonnie and Stoogey O'Stoogeson. One of them is a stooge. In this case it's Bonnie, oddly enough. No. That will be too confusing. Okay, Stoogey is your stooge. 

You go through the process of "hypnotizing" Stoogey and you say that when he awakes and you say some trigger word he will see the dollar bill on the table start to float, and that he will remember nothing of this hypnotism process.

You "awaken" your friend and say the trigger word. The dollar bill doesn't move, but he reacts as if it's floating. (Tell him not to go too crazy. That will come off as fake.)

Then you offer to do it with your other spectator. You do the fake induction, lost time, reawakening bit, i.e. "As I count back from three you're going to fall into a deep state of sleep: three, two, one.... Two. Three. Open your eyes. You are now fully awake,"

You then say a sentence with some random trigger word in it like, "So, Bonnie, how was it being hypnotized? Did it make you hungry for... cantaloupe?" And after you say that, the dollar bill starts floating for real, but you and your other friend act as if you're not seeing it. 

This may come across as more jokey than the original version. I don't know. I haven't done it. But I think it, or any other variation will definitely be interesting.

And it would be funny if, three months later, you're out getting dinner with Bonnie and another friend, say Laura. And you've pulled Laura aside to give her some instructions. And at the end of the meal Laura says, "That was good. You know what I'm really in the mood for? Cantaloupe." And one of the bills from the tip on the table starts floating but you and Laura act as if nothings happening.


After the book release when things have settled down a little, I will be recording a video to use with Version Two of the effect and I will be putting it up online for anyone to use. 

That way you'll always be prepared to do it, as long as you have an invisible deck.

In this case you'll just say you saw this trick online and you'll watch the video with your spectator. Then you'll ask if you can try it on them. 


And finally, you can flip In Search of Lost Time around and it will play as something of an awful joke. This idea is courtesy of The Other Brothers, Darryl Davis and Daryl Williams.

You do this one on one with a girl. And you do the second part first. That is to say, you offer to hypnotize her, do the immediate countdown and back up. Ask her what she remembers from the time she was hypnotized. She'll have no idea what you're talking about. She'll think no time has passed (because it hasn't, of course). You ask her to name the first card that comes to mind, then you show her that card reversed in the deck. "I hypnotized you to name that card," you say.

She will be skeptical at best.

You insist you did. You tell her she was hypnotized for almost ten minutes. She won't believe you.

"Dammit. I should have recorded it like I did the last time," you say.

"I swear that's how the trick is done. A hypnotic suggestion. Look, I'll show you a video of me doing it yesterday."

She watches the video on your phone. This time you are sitting across from a different woman, giving the same induction you gave your friend. But when this woman is "asleep" you instruct her to name the four of hearts when she awakes. You also instruct her that when she awakes she will remember nothing of what happened while she was under. You repeat over and over, "You won't remember any of this. You won't remember any of this." And you shift your chair over to hers, slide your hand down her pants, and finger-bang her to a rousing orgasm. After that you wake her up and reveal the card. 

When your spectator looks up from the video, wondering if she has been the latest victim of your hypnotic fingerfuck-fest, she sees you inhaling the aroma deeply from your fingertips.

Screen Shot 2016-08-24 at 3.04.45 AM.png

Start Your Adventure!

Look at me, putting together the baggies that contain a couple of the props that go along with effects from The Jerx, Volume One. I'm a little cutie. 

I'm pretty psyched for you guys to get the book. The last I heard from the publishing company, the books should be arriving at my friend's place in upstate New York in early September. I will be driving up there from Pennsylvania at the same time to rendezvous with my friend (who is helping with the packing and shipping) and the books. Then I'll spend a few days getting everything ready to go. Then the books should start arriving in your mailboxes a few days after that. (In the US, at least. Hopefully not too much longer for international orders.)

I will be sending out an email soon to everyone who ordered the book. The email will link to a form that will ask you to verify the address I have for you, and it will ask you if you want me to inscribe the book, and... I think that's it. I won't be sending your book until you respond to that email. So don't dilly-dally. (But at the same time, don't jump the gun and send me an email now about that stuff. I'm trying to keep everything organized.)

Also, book buyers will be sent a link to a password protected page on this site that's going to have some supplementary information and may eventually have any additions/updates to the material in the book.

And, you'll be getting an ebook soon that describes a few other effects that use the functionality that's coming to the Jerx app, other than the effect in the book. This will be sent out when the new version of the app is released, which will coincide with when people start getting the book. I'll send it to everyone who ordered the book, even those of you who didn't request the app itself. It might make you say, "Fuck it, I'm getting an iPhone."

TweAK-47

This is a post for people who have John Bannon's book Destination Zero or his new DVD/download Move Zero (Volume 2), it won't make sense if you don't. I, like everyone, think that Bannon is a brilliant thinker and creator of effects. There is an trick that can be found in that book and on that download called AK-47. This effect is in keeping with that brilliance he is known for. A spectator shuffles a deck of cards and then thinks of any card in the deck. With hardly any process you are able to show you know what card they were thinking of. It's great.

But... I never did it because it had one of my least favorite forms of equivoque in it. 

"It's not a black card, is it?"

I've gone into the specifics of why I don't like this kind of equivoque here. But basically my rationale is that it sounds equivocal. It doesn't sound like a definitive statement. And that's exactly what you don't want at the moment you're making the claim to know something you couldn't know. 

This sort of equivoque usually gets a laugh, because it sounds like a joke. It doesn't sound like someone who knows what they're claiming to know. 

Anyway, I've worked that line out of the effect and now you can too. The statement I've substituted in is one that will be completely correct or be seen as a bit of a joke, but it will never be seen as you fishing for information.

Here's how it works. You're at the point where you've just put the card down in front of the spectator. 

You say: "I think it's pretty obvious. You're thinking of a black card."

Path A: If they say, "yes," you've just nailed the color of a freely thought of card with no questions and you can complete the effect as in the original by determining their card without asking a single question. This replaces a potentially weak spot in the original where it might feel like you're guessing the color and then you have to go back to the deck and swap your prediction card.

Path B: If they say, "no," you say this, "Aww, jeeze. What a blunder. I should be embarrassed. " And you hang your head in a phony, overly dramatic/dejected way. "But I'm not," you say, and slowly lift your head. "Because I know something you don't know." Then you smile, lean in and say softly, "I'm not thinking of a black card either." With the tip of your finger you tap the back of the card on the table.

You see? Now you can complete the effect from there and it doesn't come off as a "miss." It comes off as a bit of showmanship to add drama to things. It couldn't possibly be a miss because you say this after you've already committed to the card on the table and that card never leaves their sight. So clearly you're just toying with them. 

In fact, Path B is similar structurally to a lot of moments we intentionally include in our magic. We act like we're wrong when really our isolated prediction indicates we're right. 

If you have no problem with the statement, "It wasn't a black card, was it?" If you think that comes off as a "hit," then you might not feel this is a significant change. But in my opinion, it's a big improvement and eliminates the weak part of an otherwise strong trick. This is an example of the 3rd Wave equivoque style (as delineated on this site and in the book) where it's based on seemingly definitive statements rather than unclear words or actions, and the two paths you follow are not complements to each other (so one path doesn't immediately suggest the other).