Book Report - 1/28

[Normally I remove these when I put the next one up, but that picture of Josh Jay makes me laugh so I'm keeping this one.]

I'll be honest, these updates are to keep myself on track as much as to keep everyone else informed. I was the type of student who waited until the last minute to write everything and would end up with good grades only because my writing was entertaining, not because my papers were any good . So it's important to me to stay on track with such a big project.

For some reason, in magic --and maybe this is true in other fields as well and I just don't know about it-- there is an almost tolerated practice of taking money and then not delivering a product for years after the date it was promised. People were waiting on Jeff Busby to produce the last seven issues of the Braue Notebooks they paid for for like 30 years. And now he's dead! So if you're still running out to the mailbox everyday for your Braue Notebooks... I hate to break it to you... I don't think they're coming. 

My point being, I'm dead set on this book coming out in a reasonable time frame and these posts are intended to serve as mile markers towards that destination.

Today's Work:

  • 1st draft of chapter on the U___ Y___ Ploy. Plots the evolution of magician's choice between two objects and provides a fairly unassailable 3rd-wave option for such situations.
  • Outlined chapter on the effect Narrow Your Eyes - my presentation and handling for the Hoy book test.
  • Researched fonts and typefaces for the book. 
  • Took this pic of Joshua Jay at a recent Cleveland Cavaliers game and added that hat to his Magic Atlas book cover pic. This has nothing to do with the Jerx book, of course, other than the relationship that all procrastination has to the project being avoided.

This is a Post® on Magic Blog®

I feel tremendously bad for whoever is writing Gibecière 100 years from now. I mean, the history of magic is filled with stories of magicians being spies, using their skills to assist in wars, saving lives, infiltrating the camps of other magicians to steal secrets, taking down spiritualism, etc., etc.

But what will historians write about the magic scene of the early 21st century? That dunce on the Criss Angel tour who keeps almost accidentally killing himself? 

Or perhaps they will write about this scintillating lawsuit where Yigal Mesika is suing Penguin Magic for kidnapping and sexual assault! Wait, no, I misread that... for using the word "Loops" in the metadata that led to search results for non-Loop products! Exciting! 

Look, Yigal, this can't possibly be a good use of your time and energy. I have no reason to defend Penguin Magic. I think they're a great company, but I don't think they like me very much over there, to be honest. And I'm completely supportive of people trying to retain the rights to their intellectual property, but if I go to Amazon and search for Fitbit, I also get non-Fitbit activity trackers in the result. That's just how searches work.

But more importantly, I think it may be time to let go of the name "Loops." Certainly you have more to offer than that. Do you really want this to be the scenario that plays out on judgment day?

God (or whoever oversees Judgment Day): Tell me, son, what is your legacy on earth?
Yigal: This. [Indicates invisible elastic band on his wrist.]
God: Oh, you invented that? That's pretty dope, I-
Yigal: Oh, no. I didn't invent it.
God: Well, so...?
Yigal: But I did register the trademark for the name.
God: Decent, decent. So what did you name them? Something cool, huh? Satan's Ethereal Noose? Something like that? The Wacky Circumference? Hit me.
Yigal: Loops.
God: Right. What did you call the loops?
Yigal: I called them, "Loops."
God: Of course, right up until you came up with a name for them. I get that. You're like, "So what are we going to call these loops?" So what's the name?
Yigal: That is the name. The name of the item is, "Loops."
God: Oh, please. Hit the bricks.

And then you go burn in hell or something? (Again, I'm not familiar with how judgment day works.)

I just think, if your contribution to loop --sorry-- "invisible elastic band" magic is as significant as I think it is, then having your product branded as Mesika Loops should be all the distinction you need. "Mesika" being the important and distinguishing word here (as opposed to the word that describes any goddamn thing in that general shape).

(Thanks to H.W. for pointing me to this story.)

The Phantom Tollbooth and Other Book Reports

Hey everyone, it's me, your favorite iconoclastic heterodox.  

I wanted to give a status update on the still unnamed Jerx Book that will be coming out later this year. Descartes advises us to, "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." With that in mind, I have broken down the work required to finish the book into approximately 200 mini projects, each taking a 3-4 hour block of time on my end. I'm going to work on a couple of these projects a day for the next few months. And to keep the people who donated on top of how things are progressing there will be sticky post at the top of this blog that will change daily with just a couple sentences describing what I worked on that day. I'm going to speak somewhat in generalities so as not to spoil some of the surprises, but if you don't want to know anything about what's coming, don't read the posts at all.

You might be saying, "Give me a break, I don't care about the book." Then just scroll past the sticky post, you dingbat. I did consider that it might be annoying to have a post about the book occupy the top spot for the next few months given that it's a relatively small percentage of you that ordered it. But tough shit. The only reason this site can continue is because people support it and I want those people to be in the loop. I love those people (no homodox). 

The book is getting better and weirder as I work on it. It's intended to be a "best of" the first year of this site, but about 1/3 to 1/2 of it is going to be all new stuff that will be exclusive to the book and won't be written up here (or anywhere else, for that matter). It's going to come with some specially made props and the book itself is used as a prop for a couple of tricks too. Will it be the greatest magic book ever? That's not for me to say. That's for historians to unanimously agree is 100% accurate.

For Connecting

If you're an amateur magician who performs in casual situations, then this post is one of those "price of the subscription" ideas. What? There is no subscription price? I'm writing this for free? Well... that just means it's really easy for this to clear the bar of being worth the "price of the subscription." In fact, in that case, all my ideas are worth that price no matter how dumb they are. Like... let me think of something truly dumb... Okay, go to this etsy store and get the guy to engrave a playing card into one side of one of his spanking paddles. Then, when you're with your sex slave, show the paddle to him/her and show that it's normal on both sides (via the paddle move). Then smack their fat-ass with it leaving an impression of a card. Then later force that card on them and reveal it on their own bare ass. As they say, magic that happens on the spectator's own ass is the strongest magic you can perform.

In all seriousness, what comes next is one of the more powerful concepts I've come up with in regards to magic (although I would not be surprised at all if it has been explored by other people as well). The ideas is this: To increase the power of a prediction effect, remove the prediction from the effect. Or, more broadly: To increase the power of your magic, remove yourself from the magic.

A few years ago, one of the other Andys who helps out on this site created an effect where he could predict the outcome of a game of Connect Four. (The link is just in case Connect Four isn't the universal game I assume it to be.)

Now, because I like thinking about magic in a certain way and I love testing different approaches, I asked him to try it out in the following ways:

Approach No. 1 - Say to the spectator before the effect, "I want to play a quick game of Connect Four with you. In this envelope I've made a prediction, it's a drawing of how this game will end. You can play however you want, the only thing I ask is that you try to win the game, don't just let me beat you." And after the game you reveal the prediction

Approach No. 2 - Just play the game of Connect Four with no preamble. Then, when it's over say, "Before the game I made a prediction. It's a drawing of how the game would end." Then you direct the person to open the envelope and reveal your prediction.

Which do you think would work better? Well, he didn't do 100s of trials, just a few each way and he felt like there wasn't much difference in reaction between the two. But ultimately he decided approach number 1 was better. He felt the tension that built during the game made the whole thing more exciting. That makes sense, I think.

Then, as we were sitting around, another friend said, "What if you didn't predict the result of the game at all? What if the game ended and then you go to put it away and you see the game played out identically to the cover of the Connect Four box."

This should have been my idea, because it's similar to some other things I've worked on, but it wasn't. But all of us who were present immediately thought it was the best way to go and we encouraged Andy to try it out soon and report back to us. What do you think the response was? Well, it was significantly stronger than when the trick was a prediction. It wasn't just a strong moment of magic. Instead it was a strong moment of magic that continued to reverberate as the night went on. People didn't want to drop the checkers out of the game, they wanted to freeze the moment in time. They would take pictures of it. They'd post photos on facebook and instagram with them holding the box up next to the actual game, their mouth wide open to express their stupefaction. And hours after the game, they would stop whatever they were doing and shake their head and be like, "I still can't believe that happened."

Taking yourself out of the magic is something I'm a big proponent of. In fact, that may be the heart of my style. (Either not taking credit OR claiming to have done something so unbelievable that it's clear you aren't intending to get actual credit for it.) This is a subject that is part of a lot of the projects I'm currently working on. There are a number of effects in the forthcoming Jerx Book that are about removing the predictions and the magician's fingerprints from the effect; part of The Amateur At The Kitchen Table focuses on eliminating the feeling of a performance by not taking the role of a performer; and in one of the future posts in Project: Slay Them, I'll be writing about how getting back into showing people magic is much easier when you're not demonstrating some supposed "power" but just creating moments where something amazing happens (without you taking credit for it).

I started down this path when I realized that many of my favorite effects to perform were prediction effects. And even if you're using different objects, the effects can feel the same to the spectator, i.e. they make a lot of free or random choices or actions and in the end you've predicted the outcome of those choices and actions. Getting rid of the predictions in prediction effects will make them feel like something else entirely. They can be examples of incredible coincidences, fate, or luck. They can be echoes of something that has come before. They can indicate the guiding force of some higher power or some entity on another spiritual plane. There are dozens of ways to spin a typical prediction to remove yourself from the equation.

You might be thinking: But I want the credit. I don't want to remove myself and my "power" from the equation. I want them to think it was me who did something incredible. Really? Do you? I'm not talking to the professional performer, they have different concerns than an amateur (although I think there is merit in this style of presentation for professionals as well). If your goal is to entertain or amuse or enchant someone then you have to think how you want to approach a performance. If someone watches you do something for 5 minutes do you want them to leave having an experience that made you look incredible or having an experience that made their world seem more incredible? Which do you think will stick with them more?

You might think this is all a waste of time to think about because most people will know it's a trick regardless of your presentation. And yes, this is true. But that is not a strike against this style of presentation. In fact, it is its greatest strength. Here's why: No matter how you present an effect, you will have believers and non-believers in what you say. The vast majority are probably non-believers. And when you make a prediction or say you have some amazing power, then the non-believers will be taking credit away from you. "You didn't really predict this poker hand." "You didn't really read my mind." But if you don't claim responsibility, then the non-believers will be giving you credit. And the more you deny it, the more credit they will give you. "He says he had nothing to do with this... but he must have." And even if, in these two scenarios, the non-believers are arriving at the same destination, the direction they come from makes all the difference. [If I tell you, "You won a billion dollars in the powerball lottery," and then come back and say, "My mistake. You won $40," you're devastated. But if I say, "You lost the lottery drawing." And then come back and say, "My bad, you actually won $40." Then you're like, "Cool! Let's order a pizza."] So even if your goal is to get credit, I think you'll get more by not taking it.

Beyond that, I've found people are just more likely to play along with things when you don't claim to be the prime-mover behind the effect. And why wouldn't they? What's in it for them to deny this amazing experience that just happened? On the other hand, when you say, "I'm reading your mind," or, "I can use my mental powers to predict what cards you'll select," it makes complete sense that very few people are on board. And then magic message boards are filled with people saying, "Why do they see magic as a puzzle? Why don't they believe in my mental abilities? Why do they heckle me? Why do they try and expose the trick?" Hmm... yes... what a shock that people don't want to play along with your narcissistic fantasies about powers you don't possess. 


For Christmas I got my friend, Andy, this yellow polo shirt from Original Penguin.

He was kind of confused until he opened the second present from me with this updated Connect Four packaging.

Now, right when he's about to win, he gives a big fist pump and as he goes to drop his last checker in he pauses and says, "Oh my god," and stares directly at the game box and waits for his opponent to put it all together. The game matches, the shirt matches, the fist pump matches and eventually his opponent will slap her palm against her face like the girl on the box as well. If you don't think that this is more fun, entertaining and, yes, magical than saying, "Before the show I made a prediction..." then we're occupying different worlds. I hope you at least liked my ass-paddling card-revelation.

A Magician in Barnes and Noble

Today I went to Barnes and Noble. 

I don't know about the rest of the world, but coloring books for adults are a big thing in the US these days because... well... I haven't the foggiest fucking idea why, they just are. People say they are relaxing and meditative which I guess makes sense. But take up knitting and at least you'll end up with a scarf when you're done. 

Now that I think of it, I bet this is the reason why a lot of us will sit with a book of card magic working through tricks we have no intention of ever performing for people. Thinking of it that way makes it feel a little less masturbatory, but all the same, I think if you're the type of person who practices and never performs you kind of owe it to yourself to actually give someone the experience of the effect. But whatever, that's a talk for a different day.

I think there's a market for the Magic Coloring Book effect for adults now. In fact, I would probably go all the way and use one of the ones with a truly adult theme like this one

Whoops, my bad. That last one is actually from the Donny and Marie Coloring Book from the 70s.

Anyway, I'd come out with my new adult coloring book and flip through the uncolored pages. Then I'd furrow my brow and get all upset like, "This is going to take me forever to get these to the point where I could jerk-off to these images." Then I'd pull out the Abracadildo and tap the book and show the pages were now all colored in. Then I'd hand the coloring book to someone and ask them to open it to any page and they'd find the book was stuck shut. Kind of like Paul Harris' Solid Deception, except with an adult coloring book and ejaculate.


I thought this was going to be a Steve Brooks action figure.


Oooohh-ho-ho!!! Man, I can't wait to find out what juicy secrets this book contains. This is going to be so crazy. Oh, I bet there's some stuff about his anti-semitism... maybe he has secret anti-semitic messages hidden in the park or something? What could these exciting secrets be?

OH MY GOD!!!! I never thought it would be something that provocative! This is crazy! If you have Disney stock I would dump that shit because that's going to be worthless once dirty little secrets like these get revealed.


My one purchase was the Taschen magic book which was in the discount section for $20. If you don't have it and there's a Barnes and Noble near you, go track it down. It's beautiful and inspiring and one of those things you can have around your house that many of your guests will take an interest in and it provides a natural segue into performing (if you so choose).

And I can't wait until Taschen puts together their book on magic from the 1950s to the present day. I'm really hoping they get in touch with me to write it. I would love to be able to describe the stunning and romantic visual images of modern magic.



Magic Diddlers

Hey there.

Do you know of any magicians who were convicted of a sex crime? If so, can you send me a link to an article or a police report with the details of their crime? It's for something I'm working on.

Uhm...Andy...I have no idea what this is about, but whatever it is, it sounds like an incredibly bad idea.

I know!!! 

So pass them along if you know of any. I know Bob Markwood and Jim Pace, of course. 

And don't send me anyone who was is only technically a sex criminal. Like they got caught for public urination or they were 18 and had a 16-year old girlfriend. I want the good ones. Well... maybe good isn't the word I'm looking for in this context. What I mean is, I want the legit creeps. 

Popping Cherries 2: The Secret of the Ooze

My loves, I want you to know that even when I'm not posting here regularly, I'm still with you in spirit. I'm like Jesus because when there's one set of footprints in the sand that's when I carried you. Or I just completely checked out of your bullshit and hit the waves.

I'm also like Jesus because FUCK YOU, FIG TREE!

Even though there was a ten-year gap between my magic blogs, I want you to know that I never gave up on working on the problems I identified back then such as the one that follows. To understand that issue, let's flash back to the original post on my Magic Circle Jerk blog...

Thursday, September 23, 2004

Popping Cherries 

I read an effect once and the effect required you to do a bit of fishing in order to figure out which card a spectator was thinking of. At one point in the effect you had to ask, "Was it a cherry-colored card?" And I've seen people use this line at least a couple of times in my life. In the effect I was reading it said that women will most often think of red cards so this is a pretty safe line if used on a woman, and if she didn't think of a red card there is an "out." The "out" is that you say, "Well, there are black cherries." 

Now, it's one thing if you consider that a joke (I don't, because I think jokes should be funny), but is it in any way an out? An "out" implies something subtle that makes something (a prediction or a statement) that is incorrect seem correct. But there's no way that cherry-colored shit could be considered an out in my mind. Why not just say this: Someone chooses a card and you say, "Was it a red card?" If they say "no," your out is "Well, then it was a black card." That's just as clever an out as the "black cherries" thing.

I let this issue marinate in the back of my mind for over ten years, but now I've completely solved the problem. I've created a way to discern what color card the spectator is thinking of with a statement that will always seem like a "hit" to the spectator.

Here's how it works. 

Step One: You need to stop using cards where the suits are red and black. You need to use cards where the suits are brown and pink. 

I will be selling these cards for $11.50 a deck. I assume they will become the standard cards used by all magicians after they read this post.

Step Two: If you are an American, travel to England. If you're British, travel to America. You may just want to go ahead and move to the other country in order to use this gambit as frequently as possible. If you're already an ex-pat, then you're all set. If you don't live in either of those countries, establish residence in one of them, then, after a few years, move to the other. 

Step Three: When you need to narrow down which color card your spectator picked, just put your hand to your temple and say:

"My psychic powers tell me that you picked a fanny colored card."

They will either say, "Yes! How ever did you know that!" or they will say, "No." If they say no you just say, "But I'm sure of it! Ah, I know, the problem. Where I'm from, 'Fanny' means..." etc, etc.

For those of you who aren't from either one of those countries, or just don't follow, here is the quirk of American/British English that we are taking advantage of...

Problem solved. Next!