Coming In JAMM #8

From: Nurse Andy's First Trick in JAMM #8

What I’ve been trying to do recently is apply these two ideas to all the classic effects I know: Card in Pocket, Ambitious Card, Triumph, etc. Any card effect I’ve ever used on a somewhat regular basis in impromptu situations, I’m trying to find the presentation that both points to a greater concept and does so in a way that the effect feels like a manifestation of that concept.

I've found this allows me to create a greater impact from more immersive effects even in impromptu situations.

What follows is the result of applying these techniques to Doc Daley’s Last Trick.

Nurse Andy's First Trick (a name that will likely change) is my current favorite impromptu card effect. It takes the concentrated moment of astonishment in Doc Daley's Last Trick and allows it to reverberate for much longer. Sometimes, literally, months into the future.

Subscribe to the JAMM here

Gardyloo #31

This guy currently has 16 million views on this video where he decided to sneeze rather than snap his fingers to make the magic happen. 

Of course, I've been harping on the idea that doing anything else is better than snapping your fingers. See, you dum-dums? I know what I'm talking about.

And yes, you're welcome, for your 16 million views, Neil Henry.

And thank you for acknowledging where you got the idea.

Oh, please. You're too kind. Yes, it's me. I'm "whoever wrote that." I'm that "someone" on "one of the magic sites." With all those 100s of magic blogs, I can understand why this one wasn't on the tip of your tongue. Maybe if I get you 17 million views you'll remember where you got the inspiration next time.

I'm just busting your balls. I don't give a shit. I like your video. And I don't want some corny facebook people traipsing around my beloved site anyway. There's too much riff-raff here already.

(And to be fair, while this guy's magic videos haven't really gone viral in the past, he does have one video where he "pranks" people by throwing a fake snake at them which has over 100 million views. A grand artistic achievement on his part.)


It amazes me that people will destroy their Expert at the Card Table for essentially worthless Jerx Point. Not that I don't think it's a fair trade (the book is "essentially worthless" as well), but just because now we know there are roving bands of magic tough-guys who will murder you for daring to defile that classic tome. It happened to Daniel Madison, it can happen to you. 

So yes, feel free to destroy your copy. But just know you'll make their shit-list, and then you're on their hit-list. 

Here's are two soon-to-be dead readers who recently destroyed copies of The Expert at the Card Table.

This next guy incorporated the poem from the advertisement for the 1979 movie Magic in his destruction. A nice touch. That poem ends with, "Magic is fun, we're dead." This will be all too appropriate when he ends up getting murdered for making this.


Here's a color change that's fun to play around with. It's just a combination of a couple existing principles, so I wouldn't be surprised if this has been done before, but I've never seen it and it caught me off guard when I saw my friend do it. It looked like he just tossed a face up card across the table and it changed along the way.

It's just a combination of the twirl change (or whatever you want to call it) and whatever the hell it's called where you disguise a card amongst the backs of other cards. The camouflage principle? Whatever it is. (That's as close as I can come to crediting this thing.)

Here he is doing it. I guess you can "see" it if you know what's coming, but as I said, the first time I saw it, not knowing what to expect, it looked like it just changed as it slid across the table.

So you'd have a card selected. You shuffle and keep track of it until you have it near the middle of the deck with a break one card above it. Take off a few cards at a time from the top of the deck. Weigh them in your hand like you're sensing if their card is amongst them. Then discard them onto the table in a messy layer.

When you get to the card above the break, announce that you have it, turn it over. As you do, get a break under the selection. When they tell you you're wrong, lift the double, twirl and throw.


If you're in the path of today's eclipse and you're looking for a good effect to go along with it, I recommend this. Get your friend to stand facing the sun. Then stand in front of him or her, blocking the sun with your hands. This all happens before the start of the eclipse. For the next 75 minutes or so, act like you're fiddling around with the sun with your hands. Don't let them move from where they are. Tell them you're pulling the sun from the sky. Once it's a total eclipse, turn to them and activate the D'lite on your thumb (oh, you have a D'lite on your thumb). Then do something cool and sexy with it like this.

IMG_4100.GIF

For the rest of your life the story will be told of the time you removed the sun from the sky and put it in your fucking ear, like some sort of retarded god.

Now spend the next 75 minutes putting the sun back in the sky to keep up the charade. 

Sky Imps

This is a strange post for me because I'm writing it just after midnight on Friday night (morning? whatever), just hours before I'll post it. That's why this is likely late showing up for you. Usually the posts that aren't directly related to something happening in the world of magic are things I've considered for quite a while. But in this case, about 5 minutes ago I thought to myself, "Oh, I should write a post on that." And when I was figuring out when I should write it, I realized it pretty much had to be for today's post to be of most use.

On Monday, in much of North America, people will see a total eclipse, or a significant partial eclipse, of the sun. (Or so they say. (I'm a flat-earther.))

This is an excellent opportunity to do something.

Now, look, if you're with someone who is already psyched about the eclipse, then maybe you don't need to interject yourself and your nonsense into their experience. But the nice thing about an eclipse is that it goes on for hours, so even with a real eclipse-nut, you're bound to have some downtime where you might be able to squeeze something in.

But in these types of situations I actually prefer to perform for people who are only casually interested in what's happening. That way you can elevate something that might not have had much meaning to them into a more interesting experience. 

Cosmic, celestial, sky-based imps (see the glossary if you're new here) are some of my favorite ways to get into tricks. The sky, in all its vastness, is already a kind magical/mysterious entity. It's where Jesus and the Jetsons live. And space just stretches on and on in a way we can't wrap our heads around. So it feels almost natural that these things might lead to some strange or magical experiences.

Here are some of the Sky Imps I've used:

  • Full moons
  • New moons
  • Blue moons
  • Solstices
  • Equinoxes
  • When planets reach their greatest eastern elongation (when they're at the highest point the reach in the night sky)
  • Supermoons
  • Manhattanhenge
  • When the moon occults a planet (that is, the planet gets blocked from view by the moon)

Essentially anything that happens in the sky I can co-opt as the impetus behind some magic trick.

Just google skywatching events and you'll find plenty of opportunities. Obviously the rarer the event is, the more "weight" it will have as a magical impetus. And that's why the eclipse is such a great opportunity. The last full eclipse we had in the US was almost 40 years ago. 

But it doesn't have to be Halley's comet or something to be interesting to people. 

You get a full moon every month. But there's only one October full moon a year (usually). So maybe it's just the October full moon that possesses the trait you need (hence it's more rare than just any full moon). "Native Americans used to call this the Full Hunter's Moon. They also called it the Blood Moon. And there's this old ceremony they used to conduct...." People eat this up. I eat it up too. I love the Native American names for the full moons. Or anything else named in the sky. Spend an hour of your life learning some constellations and star names. I find people are more interested in these things than you or they would think they'd be. 

That's maybe another post for another day.

So what tricks do I tie these Imps to?

Well, you have to be smart about it. You want some ethereal connection to make sense. You don't want to be like, "You know, every time there's a blue moon... I can do a perfect center deal!" 

I have something planned for the eclipse, but it's a more personal sort of thing. I may write it up after it happens, but it all depends.

In general, though, these are the types of tricks I like to connect to the skies above.

1. Levitations - The idea that there might be some gravitational or energy weirdness during some celestial event makes sense. ("Makes sense" in the storybook world of magic, I mean.)

2. Extreme Balance - Something like Patrick Snowden's Tensegrity, Joshua Jay's Balance, or Eric Ross' Balanced. You may have heard the idea that on the equinoxes you can balance an egg on its end. This is just taking that idea to the extreme.

3. Spectator as magician - For example, "There are people who believe that when Mercury is at its peak, people have stronger intuitive abilities than usual."

4. Tricks with a fortune telling element - Lots of dumb people already think that the stars have some effect on their life so to imply that during some star/planet configurations you can get some extra insight into someone's life, I think that makes sense. One of my favorite things to do is the Spectator Cuts Their Future effect from JV1. This is one of the effects that uses the book itself as a prop. It's especially fun for me because I wrote the damn book and my friends have no clue about that (or that this site even exists, for that matter).

A couple final tips about Sky Imps. 

First, I like to give the person or people I'm performing for a heads-up a week or two in advance. So I'll be like, "Hey, I want to stop by next Monday. There's something I want to try." I may even mention the event in advance. ("There's a new moon on Monday. And a fire dance through the night. Just like Duran Duran predicted!") Establishing you want to try something well in advance gives credence to the idea it had to be done during that specific event. Or else why would you have waited?

Second, it's a good idea to have it fail once. So, if you're trying to balance something, give it a shot and have it fail and then be like, "Hmm... l'll try again in 20 minutes or so. The alignment between earth and Jupiter might be more symmetrical then." (Or whatever BS you're peddling.)

These are both basic Smear Technique type things to push the experience of the effect beyond the boundaries of the trick itself.

It's well past my bedtime. Lights out.

Screen Shot 2017-08-18 at 3.49.27 AM.png

Cluster-F at MAGIC Live

Can't believe I once called him "the platonic ideal of a magic lecturer." I still feel sick about this whole thing. It ruined MAGIC Live for me, to be honest.

Live-Tweeting

No post today. Instead I will be live-tweeting a secret lecture that Joshua Jay will be conducting at MAGIC Live. It starts at 2pm Vegas time, 5pm New York time. I've finagled a seat for myself at this ultra-secret lecture and I look forward to letting you know all the juicy tidbits he shares.

And if you're thinking this is just some way for me to make a series of jokes at Josh's expense, and imply he's secretly in a romantic relationship with Andi Gladwin, how dare you suggest such a thing. Now, look, if that's the sort of information that comes out of this lecture, then so be it. But to imply that's my intention?! Wow...that's actually kind of offensive.

twitter.com/thejerx

Embedding Secrets in Secrets

Flashback 1000 years ago. It's August 14th, 1017.

You claim to have real magic powers and you perform a trick for people. Afterwards, the audience weighs their two choices:

"Either he is a clever charlatan and we must stone him to death, or he is a warlock and we must set him on fire."

Flash-forward to today. It's August 14th, 2017

You claim to have real magic powers and you perform a trick for people. Afterwards, the audience weighs their two choices:

"Either we look up how he did that on youtube, or we give him a wedgie."

My point is, playing it "for real" is a losing proposition, particularly for the amateur performer. Perhaps you could convince some people you have extraordinary memory skills, or gambling skills, or even some sort of low level psychic powers, but what's the long-game there? You're just going to pretend for the rest of your life that you're an expert at cheating at cards or you have psychic abilities? Instead of using this hobby to entertain people, you're going to do it to try and make yourself feel special? How many gambling routines do you think your friends and family want to sit through the rest of their lives?

A lot of amateurs get this concept but then swing too far the other way. "If people aren't going to believe it's real, then why bother?" And their tricks become meaningless demonstrations that are technically magic in the sense that they fool people, but there's nothing thrilling or romantic or mysterious about it. 

I believe you can have it both ways. I think you can acknowledge that yes, of course, this is not "real" magic. But the experience can still have thrilling, romantic, and mysterious moments. Or, to put it another way, magical moments. 

This entire blog is an exploration of that idea. 

One way of imbuing your performance with a greater sense of the unknown is to mess with people's understanding of magic secrets (see the glossary in the sidebar for similar concepts: imps, reps, distracted artist).

When people think of magic secrets, they think of a series of steps that one follows which allows them to apparently do something incredible or impossible. And most people's understanding of magic is that if they followed those same steps they could do the same thing, at least with enough practice.

But I like to imply that there's something more going on behind the scenes. Not something supernatural, per se. Just something they can't wrap their heads around. So when people ask me, "How do you learn this stuff?" I'll say something like, "Oh, well, there's books and dvds that teach, like, beginner's stuff. But once you get past that, it's all just passed on person to person. You can find tutorials on the internet, but that's all basic type stuff. You know, you follow some steps and do the trick. But this sort of thing we're about to do is a few levels beyond that."

Fucking with people's perception of the nature of magic secrets can become an addictive little sub-hobby.

One time I was doing a somewhat involved, process-heavy card trick for a couple friends. Because this was my first time performing it (or so I told them), I had the magic book in front of me and was reading out the process step-by-step. The trick worked. It was a decent enough card matching type effect. I set the book aside and we went on with our evening. 

Later that night one of my friend's said, "I looked at your magic book while you were in the bathroom."

"Okay," I said. 

"The pages are blank," she said.

"Huh?" I replied. "Oh, yeah. I mean, it's not made to be read by everyone. It's not that type of book. It's for a specific reader." I didn't explain beyond that because I'd already "said too much."

If that seems to fantastical for you, you can try this other variation. Same set-up, I'm reading the instructions from an old looking magic book. Later, when I'm out of the room, someone's curiosity gets the better of them and they take a peek at the book and find... it's The Count of Monte Cristo (or whatever). When they mention this I say, "Oh, yeah... they don't just write up these secrets, they always code it into another text." They'll start looking at the book wondering how the hell it could be a magic book in code. 

You may think they'd obviously see through this as just another part of the deception, but because you don't present it that way (it's just something they stumble on, apparently) it doesn't necessarily feel that way.

Here's another idea. Send yourself a deck of cards (minus the four aces) and a sheet of instructions in the mail. You don't open this envelope until someone else is in the house and you want to perform for them.

You grab the envelope off the table. "Oh, I think I know what this is."

You open up the envelope, dump out the deck, and open up the instructions. 

"Interesting...," you say, "Can we try something. I want to see if this works."

You spread the deck towards you and rearrange the order a little. Then you give the deck to your friend and ask her to shuffle it four times. 

Then you take the cards and cut and shuffle them a little yourself. 

You have your spectator cut the deck into four piles. She turns over the top card of each and it's an ace. 

Now, this is just John Bannon's Directed Verdict, which is described in a lot of places. Including The Jerx, Volume One (with John's permission). 

In this version, the aces aren't in the deck at the beginning. So you don't have to palm them out. You just have to palm them in after her shuffling. Which is not overly difficult. You could even have them under the instructions at some point and get them on the deck while readjusting the items in your hands. 

But what takes this from an impressive trick to something truly strange and mysterious is when, at some point later in the evening, your friend picks up the instructions you left on the table and reads them to herself.

The Four Ace Cutting Trick

Step One - Situate the sitter so he/she is facing the largest window in the room.

Step Two - Place the aces at the following positions. 1st ace - 43rd card in the deck. 2nd ace - 45th card in the deck. 3rd ace - at the numerical position in the deck that corresponds with the day of the month the sitter was born in. 4th ace - anywhere in the top half of the deck.

Step Three - Allow the sitter to shuffle the deck. Three times if the sitter is male. Four times if the sitter is female.

Step Four - Cut and shuffle the deck yourself. Set it on the table, untouched by anyone for at least 5 seconds. 

Step Five - Allow the sitter to cut off three packs of cards. 

Step Six - Allow at least 15 seconds to pass before the sitter cuts a final packet. (You may shuffle at this point.)

Step Seven - Have the sitter cut off the final packet. 

Step Eight - If the sitter is male, have him turn over the top card of each packet from right to left. If the sitter is female, have her turn over the top card of each packet from left to right.

Step Nine - The first three cards turned over will be aces. The fourth card will appear to be an ace to the sitter as well. (Be sure not to mention what the actual card is or the illusion will be broken.)

***

Now, to be clear, you're not reading these instructions out loud as you do the trick. You're just reading them to yourself. Then you leave them out, folded up on the table. Then go take a long shit at some point. Your friend will read them.

And when they do...?

It's not what they expected. It gives them no answers. Instead it brings up a bunch of different mysteries. Why do they need to face a window. Why have you put the cards at specific locations only to have the deck shuffled? And how could the person's birthday matter to this specific placement. Why does the deck need to be left untouched for a period of time? Why the gap in time before the last cut? Why do men and women need to do the procedure differently? And what's this about the last card appearing to be an ace? 

You return to the room. "I'm back. Just parked the submarine," you say, referring to the fresh dump you just unloaded. 

She'll ask you about the instructions. You admonish her for not respecting your things. She presses further.

You say, "Look, I don't know, really. It's not that kind of trick. This isn't like something you find on youtube or even at a magic store. Remember once I told you this sort of thing is passed from person to person? Well, to ingratiate yourself into that inner circle of secret caretakers, you can't ask too many questions. I mean, ultimately, they're just tricks. But honestly, half the time, I have no clue how they work."

This is a mind-bending notion. And if you consider the whole thing a performance, it's interesting to think of structurally. The trick itself is part of the set-up. The magic really happens when they learn the "secret."